Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 12,243 results by LogitechMouse
Post
Topic
Board Trading Discussion
Re: How can you use ChatGPT for day trading
by
LogitechMouse
on 08/09/2025, 06:53:38 UTC
If they are accurate and can trade for us, I'd do that and that's a real passive income. But Ais like chatgpt are just guides for our trades. They'll still needed to be maneuvered and control to make the trades profitable. We have gunbot and other AI bots that are published in the forum to automate the trade but it doesn't mean that when we use them, we'll be 100% profitable. There is a misconception about it still and traders especially the new ones need to understand that.
There's no such thing as 100% profitable or 100% win rate in gambling that's why professional traders always go above 1:1 as their risk-to-reward ratio, and sometimes it's around 1:2 so that if they lose one trade and win one trade, they'll still end up in breakeven instead of losing money because of that one loss.

I tried to use GetAgent (AI tool on Bitget) a few days ago with regards to SOL, it's analysis on it, and ask it as well if what position will I open including entry price, stop-loss and target profits. I will not explain anything here, but copied what the tool said, and I ended up losing money on that position, but it's something that I can afford to lose anyway just for the sake of experiment. I know that it's only 1 trade, but in the future, I'll do even more. I just need some money to do it. Cheesy

At the end of the day, AIs like ChatGPT and the like are just tools for us to have a better grasp of the coin/token. These tools makes our analysis way easier, but it isn't a tool where it gives us EP, SL and TP, and expect that we will make profit from it. Sure, you might win some, but I wonder what will be your win rate if you rely on these AI tools when it comes to trading. Hmmm.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Losing time in gambling is worse than losing money.
by
LogitechMouse
on 08/09/2025, 06:45:18 UTC
We all know you can never get time back, and when you’re losing in gambling and not even enjoying it, that’s time wasted too. Double the stress means a bad day, and sometimes it carries over, because there are always consequences when you’re addicted to gambling.

If you’re someone who values your time, you really need to be careful when taking risks in gambling. Always stay responsible to avoid this from happening. Instead of using that time to improve yourself, you get carried away and end up wasting it all on something that doesn’t even give you anything back.
I guess focusing more on sports betting makes my gambling experience more enjoyable because I have an opportunity to watch a sports game as well while putting some bets. Well, time can't be get back like what you said that's why don't spend too much time on gambling especially if you can use that time into something far more important.

If you can spend your time reading books, or watching educational videos then that's something that's more important than spending your time in gambling. Imagine if you're spending 1 hour per day in gambling, that's 30 hours worth of educational videos and you might learn the basics of 1 skill throughout those 30 hours. You'll be more productive in that way as well.

If you really want to gamble though, use spare money, and use your spare time as well. I mean invest the money AND the time that you can afford to lose. Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: 2024 PBA Governor's Cup
by
LogitechMouse
on 08/09/2025, 06:26:58 UTC
Newsome stays..

https://www.spin.ph/basketball/pba/chris-newsome-signs-new-three-year-contract-withg-meralco-a793-20250905?ref=feed_1_section
Quote
Chris Newsome has been signed to a new three-year deal by the Bolts, ensuring his stay with the organization that selected him No. 4 overall during the 2014 draft.

He must’ve been offered a really good contract for him to decide to stay with the team. He’s their best player IMO, so it’s only right that he gets the best deal. Unfortunately though, unlike in the NBA, PBA contracts are kept pretty confidential so we really have no idea how much we’re talking about here.
I don't see him playing with another team aside from Meralco TBH.

Just like when Tenorio became the face of Brgy. Ginebra, it's the same thing with Newsome. He's the face of Meralco, and he's been playing there ever since, so it's obvious that he'll stay there. On the flip side though, we know that SMC teams are well-known for those lop-sided trades to their farm teams, so I will not be surprised if after this 3-year contract of him, they will trade him to another farm team just to get way younger players.
I only really enjoyed watching NorthPort back when Romeo and Pringle were playing together. They were such a solid duo, but for me it was Romeo who really stood out on that team. That was his prime, so many killer ISO moves, and he even carried that flair into international competition.

Even though Romeo never won a title with NorthPort, I still think that was the best journey of his career.
Blackwater's been selling their franchise for many years already, and so does TerraFirma, but NorthPort did sold their franchise first. I wonder if the company made profit from it though.

Anyway, I can't remember anything achievement that's considered "significant" for the team with their whole stint in the PBA. I guess I'll remember them as the team that always goes down in the first round of the playoffs and that's it. As for the one that's buying the franchise though, I don't expect too much from them aside from the fact that they might just turn to be another farm team just like what NorthPort was the whole time.
---
A total of 122 players were included in the final list of the draft.
Is "Mr. Long Bomb" on the list? Cheesy

Kidding aside, I wonder how many of them will play for a long time in the league. If you're in the 2nd round, you're lucky if you will play a long time in the PBA because even you're drafted in the first round, your future still isn't guaranteed, and you might still end up playing outside the league.
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Bear market in october?
by
LogitechMouse
on 08/09/2025, 06:11:55 UTC
---
He also noted how this cycle can't be judged the same way as previous ones because of involvement of ETFs and other major investors. But we all know how in all previous years, the last quarter of the year is when bitcoin usually pumps. So the chance of bitcoin correcting and pumping next month is possible. Are you waiting for that pump? or have you already been affected by FUD?
Well, I will throw back what he said to us. We can't judge the same way as the previous ones, so there's also a chance that the last quarter of the year might be the start of the bear market just like what he said. Wink

On the flip side, I'm leaning towards the fact that the final quarter of the year will be a bullish one especially during the month of October where Bitcoin is very bullish during this month in all of the bull run years (2013, 2017 & 2021). I'm still waiting for the FED cutting down interest rates then from there, I will make a short term decision on what will I do with my assets. TBH, I might be selling some during the final week of September and all throughout October, and will keep some for November and December.

Overall, I'm still waiting for that pump to happen, but we need a catalyst for that to happen. WSJ said that we might see the FED cutting down interest rates TWICE, and that might be the catalyst that we are waiting. Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Do you consider bitcoin as a currency or as a digital investment asset
by
LogitechMouse
on 08/09/2025, 05:56:00 UTC
---
Open thread: What is your type of perception about bitcoin; do you consider it as a currency or as an investment asset or both?
Both, but more of an asset rather than a currency.

Like what you said, we have different perspective with regards to Bitcoin. It was created to be a currency just as stated in the whitepaper, but the volatility nature of it made it an asset since many can make money by just holding it. I haven't use Bitcoin itself to buy things either online or offline, and I always wanted to, but I'm just simply converting it to our local fiat currency and that's what I'm using. As for it as an asset, there's no need for an explanation for it since I'm holding Bitcoins for quite some time already.

Well, I guess it doesn't matter anymore if a person sees Bitcoin as a currency, as an asset, or both. What matters for me now is it's growing as a market, and every year, more and more people are interested in investing into the crypto market.
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: We are at peak BTC price.
by
LogitechMouse
on 07/09/2025, 07:17:22 UTC
---
I am now, for the first time ever, thinking about selling all of my BTC.

Why?

Because my siblings, who are very dumb, keep sending me screenshots about their latest BTC and ETH holdings. I fear we have reached peak BTC. The dumb money has arrived.

Should I sell, spend it all on hookers, or some combination of the two?
Well, anybody can claim anything, and it's up to us if we will believe on it or not. Don't worry if there are some people who don't believe in what you're saying. I can also say to myself that I have 21 BTC, and it's up to the public if they will believe me or not. Tongue

If you feel that you want to sell and take profit, by all means do it. If you feel that we're at the peak already then sell your Bitcoins. If you feel that Bitcoin's price will not surpass it's recent high of $124,000 already then sell it. Dumb money? Hmmm, I think the dumb money will come right after the FED cut interest rates because more money might be injected towards the market after that. Of course, it will not happen overnight, but in the span of 1-2 months or all throughout the Q4 of 2025.

Sell if you want to sell, but don't spend it on hookers please. Spend it on a casino instead. Tongue That would be way better.
Post
Topic
Board Trading Discussion
Re: A reason you should be careful comparing your trades.
by
LogitechMouse
on 07/09/2025, 06:58:37 UTC
---
But during the learning process one major thing that you should know is to be careful comparing your trades, that is comparing your trades with someone who is already successful in trading or even comparing your trades amongst yourself. While it may sound like a good thing to do, the danger is that even if you are doing the work to learn, it can build up a lot of doubts about your strategy and your learning pattern, you may begin to think that because you are not seeing results currently, the strategy line that you're learning is not functional when in fact it is.

Are you feeling stuck in trading due to your strategy? The person you are thinking their strategy is working, may have a strategy that is not sustainable. While it is important to be able to unlearn and learn something you should be able to understand also sometimes that your strategy is not working because you have not gone deep enough in the mastery of it.
"Trust the strategy." That's what I want to say.
If you believe that the strategy you're using works, it will work. You just need to constantly use it, and be better at that it.

I've seen people posting their successful trades on social media platforms, and there are also a few that are sharing their own trading strategy to their followers. I've seen them, but I'm not the type of trader where if I saw that my strategy doesn't work on my way, I will find another one immediately. I always say to myself "They found a strategy that works for them so I need to find mine as well." I know that it will take time for a trader to be profitable in trading. Those who are successful in trading right now took them years to learn the strategy that gave them thousands of dollars in profit.

Have a specific time frame of let's say 1-2 months. Use a strategy during that time frame then put it in a journal where you will put your trades using that particular strategy that you're using there. As for me, I'm currently using trendline trading strategy plus some indicators, and I can say that it's working for me.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Government banning of casinos are at their own loss.
by
LogitechMouse
on 07/09/2025, 06:53:15 UTC
And if the most chaos in the country is for gambling, then gambling should be banned in that country. Although there is a lot of loss of the government, good steps should be taken for the citizens. This will improve the country economically.

Of course, the safety and well-being of its citizens should be more important for the state than filling the treasury. But I believe that strict regulation of the gaming process, including limiting the amount of player's loss from the casino, will be more acceptable than a complete ban on gambling.
I agree with this, and this is my stance as well when it comes to gambling.

Stricter regulation will always be better than a total ban on gambling. Yes, gambling can be detrimental to one's health, but we can't change the fact that the country can benefit from the taxes that they're paying as well to the government. A total ban on gambling means a huge deduction on taxes that they're getting. On the other hand, a total ban on gambling doesn't solve the problem either. Do they think that a total ban means people who gamble can't gamble anymore? Nah, I don't think so.

Even the agency that's handling these gambling casinos here in our country also said that they're having a hard time taking down these illegal gambling websites. Well, at the end of the day it's them that will make the final decision. Their taxes that are being paid is a big help towards the improvement of the country... or is it? Cheesy
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Tell me how this is not laziness
by
LogitechMouse
on 07/09/2025, 06:16:03 UTC
---
I am saying all these people because i did helped two people on my tuff or so I thought, I found them web3 jobs online and since they love isolating themselves I should be easy, I waited patiently thinking that finally they will escape the tense of gambling and losing money and focus on having a life but they started complaining that they can't wait long to make money.

It's like they won't want to work and yet gambling isn't helping either, I guess this effect happened because they have tasted how it feel like to win some money through gambling so they shut every other doors.
Well, you're a great friend because you help your friends find an online job. I mean in my perspective, it really is very hard to find a job whether it's online or offline especially if you don't have any skill to offer to them.

It's just sad that gambling has affected them in a negative way in terms of how to make money. They really think that gambling is a quick-rich kind of thing where if they gamble, they can make money REALLY FAST. It's just sad that gambling really affected them that bad that they don't want to work 8 hours and wait for a month before getting their salary. I'm not against gambling per se, but I feel bad for these kind of people where they're changing who they are because of gambling.

They don't want to work, but they want to gamble? What an ironic way of thinking is that. Cheesy Anyway, I just hope that they'll realize that what they think about gambling is wrong.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: 2025 NBA Season
by
LogitechMouse
on 07/09/2025, 04:43:29 UTC
I thinking, what will be the consequences though if they are found guilty? Kawhi ban from playing or suspended for games? And Ballmer fined for millions? Might be peanut for him if that will be the case.

And for Kawhi, maybe a whole season might not be big for him as well even if they suspend his pay for a year. Although this shouldn't be let pass by the NBA as this could set precedence or this could be happening already and other team owners are doing under the table pays for their star player.
I watched a video on YouTube regarding this scandal, and I'll share the link here as well. LINK
Well based on that video, the worst thing that the Clippers as a whole may face is their future draft picks being void. The worst that Kawhi can face is a termination of his current contract, and the least sanction that the management can get is a fine that Ballmer can just pay immediately without any worries at all because... he's just the richest owner in sports right now.

I don't see any suspension for Kawhi for year because that's not in the CBA rules. I hope that Adam Silver though will punish those that are needed to be punished, and don't take this scandal lightly.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Engineers, DPWH Bulacan officials blew 300m each in casinos?
by
LogitechMouse
on 07/09/2025, 04:23:04 UTC
---
Question is, how can gov officials gamble that big when their salary won’t even cover a fraction of it? Corruption? Loans? What do you think?
Well, you said it already. Corruption.
I don't think that they'll get a loan especially if they know that they can just get millions of dollars to those infrastructure projects that they're getting.

You said that they're engineers, and there's a big issue with regards to these engineers in our country already. Now the reality about these corrupted officials is being opened already, and being known by the public. It's just sad that while there are many people that are suffering especially when there's a huge flood in their places, there are these kind of people that are spending the money that they aren't their own money in the first place into something like gambling just for the sake of their own entertainment. Sorry to say this, but these people are the type of people that must go to hell.

They're guilty obviously, and I hope that the officials will not stop until most if not all of them will get caught. Enough is enough.
Post
Topic
Board Pilipinas
Re: Pekeng TradingView ads na ginamit para ikalat ang Brokewell Android malware
by
LogitechMouse
on 07/09/2025, 04:07:13 UTC
---
Ayon sa kanilang pagsusuri, nakagawa ang malware campaign ng 75 malisyosong ads. At ang ginamit nilang ads ay TradingView. Alam naman nating karamihan sa mga crypto enthusiast ang gumagamit nito bilang financial platform para sa technical analysis. Nililinlang nila tayo na i-download ang premium version ng app na ito. At para sa mga naloko, ire-redirect sila sa isang pekeng site.
---
Kapag ito ay na-install na, magsisimula itong humingi ng malalakas na permiso, gaya ng accessibility access na itinatago sa pamamagitan ng pekeng updates. Kaya pa nilang lokohin ang mga user na ibigay ang kanilang lock-in pincode. Ganito kalakas ang malware na ito.

---
So konting ingat ingat tayo sa mga nakikita natin na apps as Android lalo na patungkol sa crypto at baka ito ang pekeng apps na naglalaman ng mga malware at pag na install na natin eh nanakawin ang ating pinaghirapang crypto.
Palagi ko itong nakikita sa Facebook wall ko. Mga TradingView app ads, na nag-ooffer ng minsan napakalaking discount para makapang attract ng maraming mga baguhan sa trading.

"If it's too good to be true, it's not true." Palagi ko itong sinasabi sa sarili ko ito bago ako magdecide kung mag-iinvest ba ako or hindi sa isang bagay. Araw-araw ko itong nakikita at alam ko sa sarili ko na hindi ito totoo KAILANMAN. Gayunpaman, naaawa ako sa mga taong nahulog sa ganitong mga scams at patungkol naman kay Facebook, sana mas ayusin pa nila ang kanilang rules pagdating sa paggamit ng Paid Advertisements at dumating sa point na tignan nila ang mga ads na naglalaman ng mga scam or phishing websites.

Tulad nga ng palaging sinasabi ni Kuya Kim noon, "Maging Mapagmatyag." Palaging tignan ang mga websites na binibisita, at wag palaging maniwala sa mga malalaking discounts gaya ng sinasabi sa ads na yan.
Post
Topic
Board Pilipinas
Re: Baguio Mayor plans to explore Blockchain technology
by
LogitechMouse
on 06/09/2025, 03:23:17 UTC
With all the talks about government using blockchain technology, it looks like a Mayor from Baguio plans to explore blockchain technology. According sa article, plano ni Mayor Benjamin Magalong na gamitin ang blockchain para e secure ang "government documents, including financial records, infrastructure reports, and other technical data.". Basically, kaya gusto nya gawin to is to make his Governance in Baguio more transparent to the public.

source: https://bitpinas.com/regulation/baguio-blockchain/
As somebody that has a very good reputation like him, this will be a good move by him.

Hindi naman lingid sa kaalaman natin na handang tumulong si Mayor Magalong pagdating sa pagsugpo laban sa korupsyon. Ang pinakasikat na interview niya na alam ko ay patungkol dun sa "Cat's eye" na nasa kalsada at panigurado alam nyo na yun na kung saan sinabi niya na ang bayad ng bawat isa ng mga yun kasama na ang paginstall ay nagkakahalaga lang ng 1,000 pero ang nakalagay ay nasa around 21,000.

Ngayon patungkol sa sinabi niya na pagimplement ng blockchain technology, malaking tulong ito, at pakiramdam ko ay kung wala namang tinatago ang mga iba't ibang opisyal natin patungkol sa mga government documents or kung ano pang report yan ay hindi sila magdadalawang-isip na ilagay ito sa blockchain hindi ba? Maganda ito, at sana ma-implement nga.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: I'm wealthy and unsuccessful
by
LogitechMouse
on 06/09/2025, 02:50:12 UTC
So I moved back to my rural hometown after long years of building a career in the capital city, met up some friends I haven't seen for ages. Hanged out, got to my story and their first question was where did I buy my house. I told them I didn't, I'm in a rental property like I've always been. It was strange at first but then I realized I was their idol, the "rich guy who made it". Then got on to other topics. "So what car do you have?" I told em, I dont have a car. "Fuck it bro, at least did you travel the world?" - Not yet. With 3 questions and 3 answers, I made their whole world view collapse. "Are you even wealthy bro?" Yessiriam. I consider myself wealthy. What makes a man wealthy? Having options. If I'd like, I could buy the house, buy the car or travel the world. I didn't because it's not financially the right decision, at least it wasn't at that moment.
I guess it's a "blessing in disguise" that I'm living in a rural area instead of living in an urban area on in this case, a capital of a city or else, I might experience the same things that you've experienced, and I've been questioned the same questions that you've received.

The term "wealthy" is a very broad word, and depending on the person, we have different description of wealthy. You can have a lot of assets and consider wealthy. You can have a healthy life without any diseases whatsoever and you can call yourself wealthy as well. You can have lots of money in the bank and can call yourself wealthy as well. I mean being wealthy doesn't mean "You have a car", or "You have a house", or you are travelling the whole world already using your own money. For me, I consider myself wealthy already just because I'm not sick, or experiencing anything bad to my health at all.

There was a question a few days ago here, someone coined what could be the biggest problem with economies. This is one of them, for sure. People can't differentiate assets and liabilities. They think they own the house, they claim they own the car, and in the meantime they're in utter debt. People strive to take on liabilities instead of building wealth which consists of assets (favorably hard or income-generating assets). They discount their time, become corporate slaves just to keep up with the illusion of their lifestyles they ought to show to the outside world.

And I see this everywhere. The four of us in the room all came from the same school. Same age. Same opportunities. Three wheeling in heavy debt, trynna keep it up with side hustles. One with a positive balance who never needs to be a corporate slave again.
Well, that's the problem when you don't have or you have low financial literacy. They think of their house or their car as something that they can sell at a higher price in the future or they think that if they have either one of them, their value increases. We can't blame them if they grew having that kind of mindset, but the best thing that we can do is to educate them what really is an asset, which are assets, and which are liabilities as well.

As for being a corporate slave, I have nothing negative against them, but if you plan on staying as a corporate slave together then that's already a problem with you. I would rather be a corporate slave, but having a side hustle so that if I don't want to work anymore, at least I have the side hustle that I will be focusing more on.
Post
Topic
Board Trading Discussion
Re: My recent experience trading sol with an AI assistant calls
by
LogitechMouse
on 06/09/2025, 02:31:49 UTC
I talked before about how AI is making trading easier on reddit & X, Back then, some people agreed and some didn’t, but I said I’d talk more after more personal experience.

Now that get agent is live, I tested it on SOL. At first, I was thinking of going long, but the AI gave me on-chain data and suggested that a short trade would be better. I decided to follow the AI’s insight, added my own touch, and ended up making some good gains.
---
What I like about this tool is how simple it is to use and how much useful info it provides. It doesn’t replace human decisions, but it really helps, especially if you know TA yourself. From now on, I’ll be using AI as an assistant in my trades when necessary.. do you agree with my assessment on AI?.
One trade could work, but I wonder if how many of those will be correct after around 50-100 signals?

The good thing about AI right now is that, it gives you the information that you need in order to make better decisions. Of course, relying on those alone isn't enough, and you need to still look at the charts, and the news around the token. I guess this is also the reason why I focus only on trading top coins because I don't have that much time looking at the charts and the news despite having these AI tools helping me with the information, but nevertheless, I will also be using these tools to make better decisions therefore, making more profit afterwards.

As for Getagent, I haven't been using it because I'm not trading on Bitget, but with this thread, I might be using for some time, and make an experiment, but of course, I will not trade on Bitget just because of how high the fees on that exchange is currently. Cheesy I prefer MEXC more.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: 2025 NBA Season
by
LogitechMouse
on 06/09/2025, 02:08:18 UTC
---
2-years, $30M (team option)
1-year, $9.5M (can be traded)
1-year, $6M qualifying offer (no-trade clause)

He chose to take less money to guarantee that he wouldn’t be traded this year. Maybe he has a girlfriend in Brooklyn or something. He left 9 million this year on the table by not being willing to sign with a team option for next year. Likely because he knew he would be traded and wants to stay where he is.
Thanks for reminding. Smiley

My personal guess as to why he picked the lowest one is that, no other team wants to sign him that's why he went with a guaranteed offer. The first option is the best obviously at least for me. I mean the Nets can trade him mid-season, but the problem is when they trade him, that team that will receive him can just waive or bought him out as well. The 2nd option is the riskiest one. I still can't think of any logical reason as to why he picked the 3rd one, but it is what is.

The best thing for him is to play better this season because he's good offensively already averaging around 24 PPG last season. I guess his defense and playmaking is where he needs to improve.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: 🥊 Tyson vs Mayweather 2026 Boxing
by
LogitechMouse
on 06/09/2025, 01:50:50 UTC
Mayweather will win, we've watched Tyson was accepting the agreement with Jake Paul to throw the game. I think, the reputation between Jake Paul and Mayweather, Mayweather has higher reputation since he never lose.

I will say Mike Tyson will not win, but the fight could ended in draw. That's what the bettors should know before they want to bet, I expect people will bet a lot of money for Mayweather.
The moment I saw this on Facebook, I already knew that Mayweather will win on this one. Well, that's why he's nicknamed "Money" because he always wants money. Cheesy

I hope we see Mayweather fighting Jake Paul as well. Cheesy As for this fight though, I don't see a draw happening on this one either. The best case scenario is a KO from Mayweather. Tyson's 60 next year, and at that age, I don't think that he can last long in the ring. TBH, I'm surprised that he lasted 8 rounds even though it's only 2 minutes per round. Maybe it's the same as this one where it will all be 8 2-minute rounds. As for Mayweather, I'm thinking that after this fight from him, he will also try to join those exhibition fights as well for the sake of... MONEY.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Is it still gambling if you're sure you're going to win?
by
LogitechMouse
on 06/09/2025, 01:34:39 UTC
There are event you can predict on that even though it's not 💯 guaranteed that you're going to win,  a level of certainty makes you think that you're surely going to win.

The downside of that feeling is that you might become over confident to use a big amount in the game since you're to a large extent certain that you're going to win.

Can we still say we are gambling if the event is something we are at least 90% sure that we are going to win?
As long as it's not 100%, it's still gambling. Even it's 99% chance that you're winning, there's still 1% chance that you're not. I've played MMORPG games for a long time already that's why even a 1% chance or even lower still matters - just like in those games where the drop rate is below 1%. I also apply it on gambling.

For me, as long as it's not 100%, I don't want to say that you're "guaranteed" to win. There's no such thing as certainty when it comes to gambling or even in investing. 90% chance of winning can still make you lose your money. I mean there's still 1 out of 10 chances that you will lose your money, and that's still a huge one. For me, there's no such thing as "sure win" in gambling despite the low odds or in this case, 90% chance of winning.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Big Milestone in Bitcoin Adoption
by
LogitechMouse
on 06/09/2025, 01:04:40 UTC
Public companies now own over 1 million BTC, which is roughly 5% of all Bitcoin in existence. At the forefront is Strategy, holding a whopping 636,505 BTC. Bitcoin is becoming scarcer, and the accumulation by big players is only heating up the market.
And that's the problem right now. As more companies accumulate their Bitcoin, the higher the chances of manipulation because anytime, they can just sell their Bitcoins as long as they're in profit. Saylor holding his Bitcoins forever? F*cked it. He isn't that stupid enough to not take profit even though 1 BTC = $500,000. At some point, he will take profit because he's a businessman/investor, and their priority is to make money and that includes their Bitcoin holdings.

I'm not sad with what's happening since they have the capability to accumulate Bitcoin whenever they want to, but at the same time, I'm not happy as well that a large chunks of Bitcoin that's supposedly going to the retain investors are going to the rich people and those who own large companies. Yes, the adoption might be increasing, but even without them, I believe that the adoption will still increase. They just made the adoption rate faster.

Big milestone? Probably, but not for me.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: List of restricted casino players hacked in the Philippines
by
LogitechMouse
on 05/09/2025, 21:03:28 UTC
Quote
---
And it seems that the Philippines can't really get out of anything about gambling as it was reported that there were hacks in the PAGCOR database. Initially though it was reported that it's the players in every casino.

But now they said that those hack accounts are those who have been ban or requested for self-inclusion.

However, this is still a hack no matter how they try to cover what kind of data has been lost to the criminals.
A hack is still a hack and no matter what they say, this is just a proof that security of these system are weak as sh*t, and they can get hacked.

I can't remember when, but recently, there was this hacking incident that involved DPWH as well (correct me with this one), but with regards to PAGCOR being breached, nothing rare because like what I said, their security is the worst. What's even worse is their reasoning. Requested for self-inclusion? Banned? It's still information that can be leaked online whatever the reason is.

At the end of the day, people in our country don't even care about this breach, and that's the reality. Cheesy A few might react negatively (like me), but most will not care that much about this one.