Users wager is still in the priority list for the SHFL allocation on that paragraph. The "Allocations and Vesting" article contains the basic details of the airdrop, where the "SHFL Airdrop 2" contains depth details. Perhaps, 10% - 20% SHFL was allocated for the affiliate part. Most probably, your affiliate wager wasn't enough compared to the other users affiliate wager. As a result, you have received a small share from that pool. The owner of BTCGOSU has received almost 24k SHFL from this airdrop. Although his own wager volume had the most impact on his airdrop amount, but his referrals wager had boosted the amount too. How much your affiliate has wagered in total?

It's a cycle that's in fact very noticeable in Bitcoin and crypto. If a service starts becoming more popular in BitcoinTalk, the scam accusations start to come one after another made by "brand new accounts and newbies". It's becoming very obvious that there's some probability that either it's the same person behind those accounts, or it's a group people who know each other and who are working together.

It's an illustration of a Sybil Attack. Add them to your ignore list.

Your accusation is completely funny and baseless. Shuffle team never gave high priority to that section for Airdrop 2. The referral related rule is the last one in the airdrop eligibility condition. Here is the airdrop 2 condition


So, it is obvious that affiliates wager had little impact on the SHFL allocation. You own wager had the highest priority in the airdrop. @holydarkness, you may check the mechanism here,

Regardless of what the story is about, as long as he covid19shuffle could convey a possible reality story it means this should be given a special attention, because I'm the case of account hack at least when an individual complain through the registered email it should be given close attention of genuine possibilities, and at that the team can go further to ask for more verification is possible ask the customer to provide the selfie with the document used for verifying the account to prove it authentication.

Rest of us who don't live in restricted areas didn't have any problems with first one, so i totally imagine getting that one too.
And since your argument is probably going to be same as in scam accusations, i will explain it:

Casinos aren't blocking restricted areas by default, because otherwise they would lose all the expats which have legal right to play from restricted countries. And they are bringing huge volume to casinos, so it wouldn't be financially practical to block them.

It more likely seems that you have used fake details to complete the KYC and that's the reason why your account was banned. I suggest you to contact the owner of the platform or its official representative and then manually submit your original KYC details and who knows if they give you another chance, but to be honest, such chances happen rarely.

I can understand your frustration having been denied for whatsoever reason what you think you're eligible for. But saying this forum doesn't observe rule keeping then you're wrong. Perhaps, you should try breaking the community rule and see for yourself when caught.

I think you need to often visit the reputation board and scam accusation board (you'll get to see issues that are been tackled there by community members) than just
 going there to drop your complaint thread.

You should stated when your account close because I remember that you made a similar scam accusation against this casino before but failed to convince the public for support.

Shuffle has 2 part airdrop while your account is already closed the time 2nd airdrop was announced so you literally doesn’t lose airdrop tokens rather you lose your account alone since you don’t have wager eligible for this 2nd airdrop.

You are using the airdrop as excuse to discuss your issue. Also you should put this post on Shuffle ANN thread instead on gambling discussion board.

This makes sense, they are all right since it is in the terms of service and you agreed with it during sign-up, not unless you are just stupid to not read those. So for me, there's no reason to blame the casino here if your funds get locked or frozen.

So, now I am curious what will happen to those funds that are frozen or locked because of violating the rules of a casino?

In my eyes, even the case was unjustified for @OP but he making a serious bad movement. Basically, upload a forged or false "KYC" even with the court better to stay quite or not doing some activity or acting can lead to our self. But this one "Forged/Faked KYC" is being confirmed by both parties (@OP admitted himself & from SHUFFLE) too leading some action from them against @OP. It's gonna to hard to be solved, or more less they just can justified to ban or closed the account due @OP make action against T&C.

If a casino makes a deal with a player, they should stick to that deal. In your case it's thousands of dollars or at least could be and 1 would think you could take them to court assuming everything you say is correct. Would you win the case? No clue, but worth a shot if everything you say is legit.

Regarding jurisdiction issues. Is there anything in their affiliate terms that say users from certain countries cannot get referrals and commissions? Might wanna look into that.

Sometimes casinos are in a rush to get players and offer very lucrative affiliate deals to users, issue is they cancel the deal once they have the players. They don't need you anymore. Again, look at the terms of the affiliates. Think about contacting a lawyer. Not saying this casino is or isn't screwing you over, but never know. A lawyer will be able to give you more answers than this forum unless you contact their campaign manager and he/she is willing to talk to the team for you, but likely they will relay 1 message and be done. If the owner wanted to talk to you, they have your info I assume and would talk to you if they were interested. So either go to court or give up.

1 last thing, if you'll notice it's all newbies agreeing with you. Looks fishy. I don't know if it's you on alts or not, but if it is stop. Just present your case and evidence and let the legit members help if they wish. Holydarkness may get involved if you're not rude.

Yes, from this user’s last commission claim to the time they uploaded forged ID, there was no activity from their players. After the ban was placed, we left the account open temporarily to allow the user to withdraw any remaining balances which would explain why they’re claiming they’re owed commission, but at that point the ban had been applied.