I’d like to clear up the air regarding this case. After speaking with Shuffle directly, they presented clear evidence that the bet in question was indeed fixed. I now understand that my earlier assumptions were incorrect.

For context, I’ve been using an AI-based bet tracker to monitor bets from winning punters across multiple sites and tailed their action. While using such a tool is completely legal, it seems it picked up a fixed bet, which led to the confusion.

I want to apologize to Shuffle for any false accusations. That was not my intention, and I take responsibility for jumping the gun.

That said, I do believe the situation could have been handled with a bit more professionalism and communication early on. Still, I appreciate them taking the time to clear things up.

Lesson learned on my end. Appreciate everyone’s understanding.

Make sure this so-called proof is not a doctored screenshot with no timestamps. Preferrably a screen recording from a mobile device. Please cite your source as well. Thank you.

Shuffle deserve an award for contradicting themselves with every word they speak. I just found this old message from their sports head David where he says I bet random games including third world soccer. David also calls all my action from last September legit.
https://files.catbox.moe/oq1roe.jpg

A flag does not arise from a newbie like me making a scam accusation. It arises from multiple trusted users on the forum also supporting the flag after viewing the relevant evidence. Instead of solving the issue at hand Shuffle keeps trying to retaliate with personal attacks and leaking private messages. The evidence is there for everyone to see and in case any trusted member wants to have a look. I can provide the evidence privately too.

Stay vigilant when betting sports on Shuffle guys!

Noah asked for a screen-recording from me, but none of the Shuffle staff have viewed the screen-recording I've sent; in the past 24 hours.

I am not going to be responding or reacting further to any replies from them here. They can reach me privately and I'm sure they know how to.

My wife is pretty mad already, and she scares me more than anything Noah can put me through.

This is fine, past is past. I'd rather focus on the only thing that matters currently. The legitimacy of the last bet I've placed.

I've sent the proof of funds to Noah via Telegram.

At this point, their responses have shifted into whataboutism, but the original issues I raised remain completely valid:

1. They falsely claimed the provider flagged the bet – when in reality, they flagged it themselves.

2. They're continuing to pursue this independently, despite three separate providers confirming the bet was clean.

3. They kept the markets open even after blocking my withdrawals for this specific game, suggesting an intent to void winning bets while keeping losing ones. No other platform removed this market. The below screenshot is from Shuffle 45min after they blocked my withdrawals for betting on this exact same game.
https://files.catbox.moe/gleyqm.jpg

Brought out of context, I was reporting being approached to David and spinning this to make me look like I was part of this instead is very bad faith.

It can be provided now that it has come to this. In the message I also clearly state that I can sign a message or send a test transaction. After this message Shuffle completely ceased communication with me while I tried to get in contact multiple times.

I have 650 bets on site and another 350 bets easily through manual bets. So a history of abusing the platform translates to 1 bet in a thousand and 1 bet I have not even placed? I was asked by David the origin of the specific shady pick, which I’ve provided promptly recently.

This is a lie, I’ve offered information on an account that was sold to a Ruski who needed accounts with limits, as I knew the account’s previous owner and they owed me money. Not sure how that has been twisted into me being part of this ring. I have never been to, nor speak a word of Russian.

Not sure how betting $30,000 is suspicious when I’ve bet $100,000 per bet prior to this on multiple occasions and even $1,000,000 a few times. As for being an obscure market for me to bet on, I’ve bet on very obscure markets before too: from FIFA to Badminton to Chinese basketball.

An article from 7 years ago, with an investigation that led nowhere, is not the revelation that you think it is. You can find such articles about some of the biggest athletes too.

I refused? I provided the video proof to him as he requested, the moment he asked for it. I also offered to sign a message of his choice or send a transaction to an address of his choice from the address I deposited. This is a straight-up lie.
https://files.catbox.moe/kgibsz.jpg

So it was a lie all along that the provider flagged the bet. The first thing I was told was the provider flagged the bet. But in fact, it was you guys flagging the bet yourselves, then asking the provider if there was suspicious activity. You are also stating that the provider cleared the bet of suspicion, and upon my own research, 2 other providers have cleared the bet of any suspicion as well. So somehow you claim your internal trading team is better than 3 different providers? And it was not Radar Integrity Services that flagged the bet as David claimed to me.
https://files.catbox.moe/kx1oyk.jpg

Again an attempt to dodge the question at hand by them using what-aboutism. That situation has nothing to do with the current bet.
In fact During the last one month, I've helped them spot bad actors on Shuffle myself and this is what I get in return.

Also want to highlight the fact that David's first message about the provider flagging the bet was a complete lie. It was shuffle themselves flagging the bet then asking the provider for an investigation. I've heard of innocent until proven guilty before. I'm hearing about guilty until proven innocent for the first time now.

I've sent you the evidence through private messages. Please have a look.

The initial bet amount has been returned, now I'm waiting for them to settle it as a win.

User:  ndumm (Shuffle)
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3466374
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3436
Flag Type: 3
Reason: Shuffle refuses to pay out winning bet, falsely accuses me of cheating.
Full case here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5557348

I've raised a flag against Shuffle here on this forum. I'll fight for the innocence of this bet and me, till I'm settled the full winning amount.

It has to be paid as a win and I've provided relevant proofs of my innocence to some important people who will have a look at this matter. My fight will continue till my bets have been settled as wins.

Shuffle representatives used to reply within 5 minutes prior to this win but now are giving me the silent treatment with no replies past 3 days.
Aren't willing to have a conversation; this seems more like some sort of revenge plot for being a winning player rather than an investigation as no other website/provider has flagged or investigated this specific match.

How can Noah accuse me of betting on a fixed match when I’ve already spoken with Eddie (Stake’s owner), and he confirmed that Stake — which uses the exact same sports provider as Shuffle — received no flags whatsoever?

I also checked with other providers, and not a single one had any suspicious alerts. If Stake and others using the same feed cleared the game, then how is Shuffle suddenly calling my bet a “fix” and holding my balance?

I’m currently in Curaçao, where Shuffle is licensed, and I’ll be pushing this matter hard with the authorities if my funds are not released. Under Curaçao law, operators are required to segregate player funds from operational capital and cannot seize deposits under baseless accusations.

I can also provide the evidence and provider confirmations privately to any users here who’d like to cross-check.

Segregation of Player Funds: Article 3.2 of the LOK requires operators to separate player funds from operational capital to guarantee availability at all times. Deposits are the property of the player, not the casino, and must be safeguarded.

Transparency of Terms: Article 5.1 obliges licensees to provide clear, transparent terms regarding the handling of bets and winnings. No provision allows confiscation of deposits without regulatory or judicial order.

AML/Criminal Exception: The only circumstance where deposits may be frozen or seized is under Article 7.4 (AML provisions), in cases of suspected money laundering, fraud, or criminal financing. Even then, seizure must be coordinated with authorities—not imposed unilaterally by the operator.

This sets a terrible precedent. You can’t let bets run, wait until they win, and then swoop in to seize both the stake and the payout under some vague, unproven “integrity” excuse. Industry standard is clear: void the bets if there’s a real issue. What you’re doing isn’t risk management, it’s theft — plain and simple.