The fact that this is normal for them does not correspond with how they played their first game this season. They won, no doubt about it, but the game itself was not the most exciting; it was difficult for them, and I think they are simply not used to Alonso's style of play and his demands yet. Alonso himself said that this is not a one-year project and that it is not a given that he himself believes in victory in the first season.

I mean, of course, sports betting. In casino games based on chance, such as roulette, many more people will not be able to get rich - 99.9% or 99.99% or even 99.999%. There are many prerequisites for such a forecast. On the one hand, we know the statistics, although they are contradictory. The overwhelming majority of players, approaching 99%, according to various estimates, lose money in sports betting in the long term. If you ask me for links to studies, then, I'm afraid I will have nothing to show you. This is very difficult to do and difficult to achieve truthful results. Not all players are inclined to tell the truth and it will be difficult for an outside researcher to verify. However, the longer the period we take, the more likely it is that the winners are only people who were lucky. So I wonder what motivates people who want to get rich on sports betting if they believe in such a pattern? Do the players sincerely believe in their own exceptionalism and genius?

If faced with a choice I think Manchester United need a defender, I'm not saying the current players are bad but it's not a bad idea to prepare a better squad. Last season's experience should be an example of the failure of the defensive line even though there are many reasons there. Based on Man United transfer records this season, they are prioritizing the attack line by spending 150 million while for their defense line they only spent 4 million + new players from the academy. I don't understand why the coach is so confident in the current defense line or maybe he has other plans?

Don't you see how gambling is tempting, like you can use $2 to have different possibilities with potential win of $1m depending on the casino max cashout but winning that potential money is the problem because casino isn't foolish enough to make you a millionaire in just one day. You have seen how gullible people put money on ponzi schemes even despite the warnings? It's not like they don't know, they do but they are just stupid because of greed, that's how gamblers think sometimes.

Is it really possible to reach that stage?
The social circle we surround ourselves with is enough to control an addicted self, and I believe that's effective, provided that the habit of using a smartphone or staring at a PC monitor is limited.

I don't know how everyone spends their time outside of work. My busy schedule consists of gatherings, enjoying drinks, and casual conversation without a smartphone. Situations like that can help distract me from the habit of online gambling.

Gambling is not an event that a gambler must guarantee himself to win but it is an event of prediction. You only predict to win and in the process you might lose or win. Though there is an anxiety to win for new gamblers and most time it is when they win in their first games and you will see them gambling every day to win big. Even though they are at the losing side they believed that they will win big one day. That is the believe of all gamblers and not only the new gamblers.

What a good way to start the season. Op congratulations it was courage that lead you this far, but to some extent it's considered as greed  to ignore a cash out worth 29x of your bet amount.

Since this season began I've had several  cash out  opportunities but refused to seize them and unfortunately  they all ended up in loss I've not made any win this season  however I'm  not pressured because  I didn't  stake with money above my means or gambled irresponsible I promised to follow schedule and so far it has been working for me, unlike when I gamble based on how I feel at the moment.

Manchester United hosting Arsenal at Old Trafford on first matchday for both sides, this was a crucial game and winning was expected from both sides but unluckily for the Red Devils, they settled for defeats which is weigh out of the picture. Ruben Amorim men come out and play good football but no evidence to show for it since they're battered and stopped by the formidable defendlines of the visitors.

Mikel Arteta and his men had just one target, a win win situation was all they privatized for and they captivated their scoring opportunity in the first halve. In the second halve, Gunners got under pressure and couldn't slash their chance, they fought for defensive display but was it good enough? Oh yeah we see how determined and fierce they were in the defenseless. Arsenal are competitors and EPL title contenders this season.

It will never be fun to me watching animals fight to death and I will not bet in such cruelty, I think it’s something that should not happen, in my country cockfight is not popular but we have ram fight and I also think it is cruel. There is a line between fun and wickedness and cockfight is a very wicked and cruel sport.

Borrowing is not bad, but your reasons for borrowing determine if its worth it or not. For individuals taking a loan for an investment is good, because your investment or business will generate profit and it can be used to service your loan and hopefully break free from it, but taking a loan for luxury use, I don't thinks it's advisable.
Countries definitely need to borrow to help it develop, because I have never seen or heard of country that develops without borrowing. So it's very important for such countries to put the money borrowed to good use, so it can help develop the country.

With so many people around the world buying Bitcoin, it’s like a city’s power supply system suddenly collapsing. I can’t imagine it. What do you think?

Even statistically, Atletico Madrid were superior in all aspects and should have won the match. however, Simeone made a blunder with his substitutions, which disrupted the rhythm of the game, left the midfield vulnerable, and allowed many unchallenged crosses. this gave Espanyol the chance to capitalize on their opportunities. it serves as an important lesson for Simeone as he must anticipate the impact of every tactical decision and work on improving the team’s efficiency.

What's your opinion, do you support his statement?

Sometimes I try this pattern myself, always paying attention to each roll before finally buying the bonus... but in the end, I fail more often than I win, especially since I don't really believe that I can predict when the lightning will strike.

What I often do in slot games is try spinning several times after breaking the pattern, then buy spins. The results are still uncertain, but this gives me confidence in slot games, even though winning is still random.

Let alone gambling, sometimes we have many perspectives on loans, such as when we borrow for investment or to support our lifestyle, and even that will have pros and cons.

Especially when it comes to gambling, which we clearly know is merely a game of chance. When we’re lucky, we may achieve good results in gambling, but when luck isn’t on our side, we’ll end up making things much worse because we’ll inevitably suffer losses from it.

Therefore, it is clear that forcing one's will in this matter is not advisable, although it may depend on individual choices when borrowing money for gambling. However, as advice, it would be better to avoid such actions because the results will not be effective if forced.

Gyokeres is a player that many expectations are expected from him and that makes it very observant to everyone when he performs less in any game. This may be his first season and first game in the Premier League which was suppose to be overlooked for him, but he’s blamed by many already that he’s a poor player that can not do well in the premier league. Gyokeres should be giving more time in my own opinion, because I feel he’ll do better with time and have to first understand the pattern of the game before we can rate him again. He will not have a poor stay in this club but he will continue to develop overtime.

For example, let’s say one team starts off slow and falls behind early, but then they suddenly make a strong comeback. The game becomes close, and at that point the betting line gives you pretty good value if you pick them to win.

Would you place your bet on that team just because they have the momentum on their side, or do you think it’s just an illusion and not really a factor in the outcome?

There's nothing mankind isn't capable of, including this you mentioned here. So, we can't completely rule that out in sports and betting.  I believe if that's possible at the lower league, it will also be possible at whatever top league there is. It's just that those at the more established leagues will be more discreet than the amateurs, knowing what's at stake and the dire consequences if their cover is blown off.

We've seen awards go to players we ordinarily believe didn't deserve them. If anything, such alleged skewed awards also point to rigging. Anything handled by humans is bound to harbour compromises. Match fixing isn't an exception. That's my conclusion.

Barcelona had taken a 0-2 lead in the 23rd minute, but red cards for Morlanes and Vedat Muriq made things even easier for Barcelona.
Morlanes was sent off for a second yellow card. Five minutes later, Vedat received a direct red card for a serious foul on an opponent.
From that moment on, the game was over for Mallorca. Even in an 11-on-11 match, Barcelona could have dominated, but in a 9-on-11 match, Barcelona easily won the match. Two shots hit the post, and Yamal scored the final goal in the 90+4 minute, earning his team a 0-3 victory and three points in La Liga.