This whole thing is obvious now they are selective scammers.

If aml was actually the issue, his cousin’s transaction wouldn’t have gotten refunded so quick, same source, same destination, just a different spot. Looks like they’re picking and choosing who to enforce rules on, which is a huge scam vibe, especially since they’re not even replying to emails.

Massive red flag that they only seem to play by the rules for eu/us users while making everyone else wait forever.

This kinda stuff is exactly why people are ditching cexs for dexs.

At the heart of this is just basic fairness and sticking to what was agreed on.

Betfury accepted Dplay’s bets in good faith. Those bets were already well on their way to winning, some even had 3 out of 4 legs already settled in his favor. That’s a huge trust issue.

Yeah, casinos technically have the right to void bets, but using that power after a bet is clearly winning just feels shady. It basically sends the message: "We’ll take your money when you lose, but cancel when you win." That’s not how fair play works.

Maybe try reporting them to Binance if possible, through your local authorities, to see if they can step in? This isn’t about aml compliance, it’s straight up theft.

No legit aml process takes 40 days plus. This is just a stalling tactic. Refusing refunds after KYC is submitted goes against their own policies and even violates gdpr.

They’re not a real service, they’re scammers.

Alright, so I’ve been following this whole bcgame mess and the way holydarkness is handling it is just… off. He says he’s neutral, but come on, he’s clearly siding with bcgame. All he does is nitpick the ops  story, like what device they used, or how they logged in, while completely glossing over the real issue -  bcgame straight up refuses to pay out a legit $1.5M win.

And here’s the thing, there’s zero proof the player broke any rules. Unholydarkness keeps bringing up multiaccounting, but that second account? It was made by accident because bcgames signup system glitched out. Not even the player’s fault.

Even worse? He doesn’t mention the court ruling in Curacao that literally sided with the players and declared bcgames parent companies bankrupt over unpaid winnings. That alone should’ve ended the discussion. But nope, Unholydarkness just kept going with his onesided take.

Let’s not forget how shady bcgame has been either:
- No public statements, just dming with holydarkness behind the scenes.
- The whole “third account" thing was sketchy and unverified (wrong currency, no kyc etc)
- They ran off to belize and anjouan after losing in curacao, total jurisdiction hopping.
- oh, and trying to move their domain names right after the ruling? yeah, totally normal behavior for a trustworthy company… not.

At this point, holydarkness is looking more like a paid pr guy than someone giving a fair analysis. He never questions bcgame, never acknowledges the court ruling, and avoids explaining why he’s ignoring so many key facts.

The bottom line is simple:
- The player won fair and square.
- There’s no real evidence of cheating or bonus abuse.
- A real court already said bcgame has to pay.

Yet here we are, with holydarkness running interference while bcgame pulls every scammer trick in the book. Let’s stop pretending there’s some big mystery here - the player deserves his money, and bcgame is a scam operation.

End of story.

This is just another classic example of how shady and predatory changenow really is. Seriously, they’ve been pulling this exact scam on people for years now. Just check reddit, there are tons of posts about it. They let the small swaps go through just fine so you think everything’s chill, and then as soon as you try to move a bigger amount, they freeze.

Total scam move.

What a joke. Not a single question publicly aimed at bc, even after the op shared proof of their shady stuff. Everythings happening behind closed doors, hush hush - why?


My issue with all of this is how bc has stayed completely silent. Not a single word from them. Does holydarkness speak for them now? If they can share evidence with him, they should at least be able to come on here and clarify that.

Oh my god, you are dumber than I thought!

Is this what you are basing your argument on?

I don't think you’re fully getting how the court stuff played out here. You keep saying the court didn’t explicitly say bcgame has to pay op, but like... the bankruptcy ruling kind of says it all.

They don’t declare companies bankrupt just for fun, that ruling basically means the court agreed the player claims, including op’s, were legit.

I did some digging and found a couple sources:

NEXT.io article : https://next.io/news/regulation/bc-game-declared-bankrupt/
Title: BC.Game Declared Bankrupt Amid Unpaid Player Claims - says the curaçao court declared bcgame’s parent companies - small house bv and blockdance bv bankrupt over unpaid player claims. Mentions the lawsuit came from multiple players, op included for withheld winnings. Notes bcgame dipped out to belize/anjouan after the bankruptcy

Curaçao Chronicle article: https://www.curacaochronicle.com/post/main/curacao-court-declares-bankruptcy-for-blockdance-and-small-house-amidst-unpaid-player-claims/
Title: Curaçao Court Declares Bankruptcy for Blockdance and Small House Amid Unpaid Player Claims
This one straight up says the court ruled in favor of the players, also confirms bcgame owed over $2.1M, and yeah, it calls out the bankruptcy as a dodge to avoid paying up

So while it might not be in the form of a big bold “bcgame must pay op,” the rulings and articles make it super clear the claims were valid and the company was held accountable - at least on paper.

I think you meant to say may 25th... but if you're somehow in june already, don’t forget to check the winning lottery numbers!

No offense taken, but if you don't like what I have to say, you can simply put me on ignore and you won’t have to read my posts. This is a public forum, and the topic is now part of a public discussion.

Ha ha ha…  you sound like you need a hug  .

I'm no law student but even I can highlight where the op mentions winning a court case against bcgame:

Initial claim of winning the lawsuit:

Further clarification:

And here:


If you still don’t understand my point let me break it down further for you:

1. The op and other players won a legal judgment in Curaçao, leading to bc.game’s bankruptcy declaration.
2. bc.game did not comply with the ruling, leading to a trustee being appointed who confirmed the validity of the claims.

It's either you are dense or  maybe you are intentionally obtuse. You sound crazy and your delusions seem to be on overdrive.

Yeah I agree with you, I really don’t think anything holydarkness says or does is gonna magically get the casino to pay the op.

And as for whether bc lied or scammed the op, the court already made that clear. they ruled in the op’s favor, along with 3 others.

So there shouldn’t be any doubt at all about who’s in the wrong here. It's bc games. full stop. And they should be called out publicly so other players know what they’re dealing with.

At this point, there’s really nothing more the op or holydarkness can do.

Lol, no disrespect, I actually respect you as a poster, but do you really think holydarkness is gonna fix this?

Like, this is a case that’s already gone to court. Are we seriously saying he’s gonna uncover something that judges and lawyers couldn’t?

I really doubt it.

His line of questioning is just dumb tbh, it’s not helping the op at all. And the op’s totally within their right to tell him to back off if he’s not adding anything useful.

If holydarkness actually wanted to help, he’d be calling out bcgames directly, asking real questions in public, not just cuddling them. Maybe get one of his contacts or a rep to show up here and explain why they won’t pay the op and why they ditched their curacao license for another sketchy jurisdiction.

Hyping him up isn’t solving anything. We’ve seen how this goes, the second he loses control of the narrative, he throws a fit and starts gaslighting people.

Sorry for your loss, but how much did they get you for? You've still not said how much was involved except mention you were scammed.

After reading through gh0573d’s full story and looking at the receipts, it’s pretty obvious that bc.game is being shady and trying to duck out of paying legit winnings.

Here’s what we know:

1. The op has dropped solid proof, video recordings, court docs, and full convos. bc.game? nothing convincing in return.
2. They won $1.5 million fair and square.
3. Before that, they’d withdrawn smaller amounts without any drama. but when they tried to cash out the big one? Boom, account blocked.
4. The excuse? “prohibited techniques.”  except… there’s no proof. The only “evidence” bc.game brings up is some glitch with google sso that accidentally made a duplicate account, one the op didn’t even touch. If that was a real issue, bc.game should’ve flagged it way earlier, not just when they had to pay up $1.5M.
5. And here’s the wild part, the op even won a court case in curaçao that said bc.game owed them the money. Instead of doing the right thing, bc.game:
faked documents - yes, really, uploaded to imgur and everything - and filed for bankruptcy in curaçao to get out of it
6. They then moved their registration to belize/anjouan to dodge any legal action

These are straight up scam tactics, legal hide and seek to avoid paying what they owe.

Meanwhile, bc.game keeps trying to act squeaky clean on forums like bitcointalk and casino guru. they’ll respond to small complaints to look helpful, but when it comes to huge cases like this one? silence. and yeah, still running their signature campaigns to reel people in.

That casino guru even tossed out the op’s case with zero transparency smells a lot like affiliate bias.

Why this matters:

If bc.game can pull tricks like this to keep $1.5M, then no one’s really safe. Crypto gambling already has enough trust issues, this kind of stuff just makes it worse.

Now, I know unholydarkness is probably gonna jump in saying the op’s a bad dude, maybe even in jail, or that his writing doesn’t match between posts and emails, all that deflection nonsense. But none of that changes what bc.game did.

There are scam accusations against them on this forum literally every week. So here's the real question for unholy - you can choose not to answer  :

Even if we say the op is a terrible person, does that suddenly make it okay for bc.game to steal their winnings?

Oh wait, according to you, he’s not even the actual owner of the account now? Right. so that somehow makes it fine to:

Fake documents,
File for  bankruptcy in curaçao
Move jurisdictions just to not pay?

Make it make sense please.

Your behavior - deleting posts and comments you don't like makes you guilty in my eyes.

Count me in:

bc1qxgf0phx8d6dahrhwk9zun7cqpvawa26fpeq4vw

Wow man, this is honestly just messed up. really sorry you’re going through this bs.

You played fair, verified everything, followed their process, then as soon as you win big, they shut you down? sounds like a straight up scam. These betting sites love to take your money when you're losing, but the moment you get lucky and win, suddenly you're "under investigation"... yeah right.

Honestly, that "rule" they quoted is just a blanket excuse to do whatever they want. "at our absolute discretion"? come on. it's like they wrote it so they can legally scam ppl whenever it's convenient.

It’s good that you saved video proof and all your transactions, that’s gonna help a lot if you push this legally. i’d definitely try to go through their license holder or regulatory body if they have one (tho not all of them do... sketch af).

Keep us updated, seriously hope you get your money back. and thanks for warning others too, a lot of ppl prob wouldn’t even know this site was shady til it’s too late.

You played, you lost. You should move on. It seems you're trying to free roll the casino.

Someone sued them and won. As to whether they'll pay, that's another matter entirely.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5534261.0

There seem to be quite a few complaints for huge amounts against Stake on here recently; this is the third one I've seen in a short span of time.